|Vermont is No. 1 in public health in the US. Why the rush to eliminate vaccine exemptions?|
By Brian Gaston
Food Freedom News, May 5, 2012
“When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we, in essence, accept that the state owns our bodies.” U.S. Representative Ron Paul
In Vermont, the vaccine industry attempted to remove parents’ right to philosophical objection to vaccines. Vermonters stood up for their rights and the legislature stood with the people.
But this battle to remove parental rights to decide what is best for their child affects every family in the country, and it is far from over. The pharmaceutical industry is working state to state to remove both philosophical and religious exemptions.
It is crucial to be clear that most families right now do not even realize exemptions exist or how to get them, and are cowed by school or medical or government authorities who say they must get them which is untrue.
Parents are not informed either that they have a choice whether to let them children be injected with vaccines or about their dangers. From the Alliance for Human Research Protection:
“…. the reality is that much of what public health officials and vaccine manufacturers proclaim is not backed by science or experience.
“…. Not only have the vaccines failed to protect against the targeted disease, but the vaccines are implicated in increasing the likelihood of children becoming infected with more virulent strains of the disease.
Exemptions for vaccines go to the heart of the issue – the human right to refuse vaccines on any basis. From Dr. Mercola:
“The issue of protecting your right to make an informed, voluntary vaccination choice for yourself or your child in the United States is about defending human rights.” As Barbara Loe Fisher, president of NVIC, states:
“‘While the State may have the legal authority to mandate use of vaccines, nobody has the moral authority to FORCE you to get vaccinated or vaccinate your child without your voluntary, informed consent.’”
But the government has been allowed to put out false “health information” around vaccines, and arguing over it serves as a powerful distraction from two undeniable criminal actions that vaccines are now being used to perpetrate against children’s bodies. The need for this information and the basis for refusal now has become urgent.
1. Any child in the US who is vaccinated with the new DNA vaccines, and with vaccines that are part of the CDC’s mandatory vaccine schedule (as well as any person taking the flu vaccine) are being subjected to polysorbate 80, a sterilizing agent.
That fact is not deniable since polysorbate 80 is listed as the preferred ingredient in a phama patent entitled “A Fertility Impairing Vaccine.” (The University of Georgia Research Foundation [pharmaceutical companies, along with agribusiness] is listed as the patent applicant.)
“In the description section of the patent application, Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) is listed as a preferred ingredient:
“‘In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil, in an amount of about 2.5% to about 15%, preferably about 8% to about 12%. In preparing the vaccine it is advantageous to combine a concentrated oily adjuvant composition with an aqueous solution of the antigen, pZP glycoprotein. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin (about 5% to about 15 % wt/vol, preferably about 12% wt/vol) and STDCM (preferably about 25 mg/mL to about 50 mg/mL) in squalene oil. The term % wt/vol means grams per 100 mL of liquid. The aqueous solution containing the isolated pZP glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80 (about 0.2% vol/vol to about 0.8% vol/vol, preferably about 0.4% vol/vol).’”
That is, American children and all those taking the flu vaccine are being subjected without their knowing to a sterilizing agent. Put more bluntly, Americans are being subjected to compulsory sterilization under the cover of “health.”
The pharmaceutical industry was experimenting on Auschwitz prisoners to develop just such vaccines, ones that could be given at routine doctor’s appointments that would sterilize covertly. From Have Rabbis Forgotten the Experiments on Jewish Women at Auschwitz?
“Auschwitz was the largest and one of the most infamous of the camps and the site of numerous ‘medical’ experiments. This historical study uses primary source documents obtained from archives in England and Germany to describe one type of experiment carried out at Auschwitz — the sterilization experiments…
“The purpose of these experiments was to perfect a technique in which non-Aryans could be prevented from reproducing while still being able to work as slave laborers. ….
“Dr Adolf Pokorny, a Nazi physician wrote to Himmler in October 1941: ‘Should we succeed in obtaining a method, permitting as quickly as possible to sterilize people without their knowledge, then we would get hold of a new, most effective weapon.’”
“In July 1942 Lieutenant General Rudolf Brandt, Himmler’s personal advisor (Strzelecka 1996), contacted Clauberg, asking on behalf of Himmler, [how long it would take] to sterilize 1000 Jewesses. The Jewesses themselves should not know anything about it. As the SS Reich Leader [Himmler] understands it, you could give the appropriate injection during a general examination.
Wikipedia’s background on Compulsory sterilization in the US:
“The United States was the first country to concertedly undertake compulsory sterilization programs for the purpose of eugenics.> The heads of the program were avid believers in eugenics and frequently argued for their program. It was shut down due to ethical problems. The principal targets of the American program were the mentally retarded and the mentally ill, but also targeted under many state laws were the deaf, the blind, people with epilepsy, and the physically deformed. According to the activist Angela Davis, Native Americans, as well as African-American women> were sterilized against their will in many states, often without their knowledge while they were in a hospital for other reasons (e.g. childbirth). Some sterilizations took place in prisons and other penal institutions, targeting criminality, but they were in the relative  minority. In the end, over 65,000 individuals were sterilized in 33 states under state compulsory sterilization programs in the United States.>]> ….
“After World War II, public opinion towards eugenics and sterilization programs became more negative in the light of the connection with the genocidal policies of Nazi Germany, though a significant number of sterilizations continued in a few states until the early 1960s. The Oregon Board of Eugenics, later renamed the Board of Social Protection, existed until 1983,> with the last forcible sterilization occurring in 1981.> The U.S. commonwealth Puerto Rico had a sterilization program as well. Some states continued to have sterilization laws on the books for much longer after that, though they were rarely if ever used. California sterilized more than any other state by a wide margin, and was responsible for over a third of all sterilization operations. Information about the California sterilization program was produced into book form and widely disseminated by eugenicists E.S. Gosney and Paul B. Popenoe, which was said by the government of Adolf Hitler to be of key importance in proving that large-scale compulsory sterilization programs were feasible.> In recent years, the governors of many states have made public apologies for their past programs beginning with Virginia and followed by Oregon> and California. None have offered to compensate those sterilized, however, citing that few are likely still living (and would of course have no affected offspring) and that inadequate records remain by which to verify them.
“Thus, without question, the CDC’s mandatory child vaccine schedule requires that American children be exposed to a sterilizing agent, not just once but between 60 to 70 times (and more if more vaccines are mandated) over the course of their childhood, and this toxic assault on their bodies begins on the day of birth.”
Parents not only have the right to philosophical objection to any or all vaccines, but most certainly have the right to informed consent. All of the mandated vaccines for their children must include information that polysorbate 80 is a sterilizing agent and one that is “preferred” as such in a pharmaceutical industry patent, and therefore deemed effective.
Parents in all states have the right to protect their children from being compulsorily sterilized in this deceptive manner. This is a criminal assault on their children’s bodies. In truth, parents should give this attack an even more seriously criminal label, because “imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group” meets the UN”s definition of genocide.
2. Any child in the US who is vaccinated with the new DNA vaccines and anyone taking the flu vaccine is having their DNA being contaminated with patented GMOs.
Those being vaccinated with the new DNA vaccines are automatically turning their “intellectual property” over their own DNA over to the vaccine manufacturers by allowing that DNA to be contaminated. The vaccines replicate how seeds are genetically engineered (patented GMOs are shot into the DNA), permanently corrupting it. But putting aside the damage to DNA, there is a undeniable commercial issue here. NONE of the legal issues of intellectual property rights over the DNA have been mentioned much less settled. What claims might the vaccine companies (or government which shares patents with it) make over the child’s “patent-tagged” blood, organs, etc. since patented DNA would be in all of it? Given the aggressive actions of Monsanto, a biotech company, against farmers whose fields were contaminated – involuntarily – by Monsanto’s patented intellectual property via pollen drift, and Monsanto’s refusal to say they will not sue those who were unwillingly contaminated, there is no reason to believe that the vaccine industry, biotech companies, will behave any differently. In fact, there is already action in Colorado to show how the drug companies may behave around control over what is in someone’s body.
According to the FDA (which is controlled by the drug companies), adult stem cells are now drugs and the government claims the right to regulate them. How much more assertive would biotech companies behave when what is in people’s body includes patented material?
Parents in Vermont have been arguing uphill against bogus “health” demands put forward by the vaccine industry. But this is a more simple argument. Parents in Vermont have the right to protect their child’s “commercial” interests from the biotech pharmaceutical industry, just as their farmers are working to protect their own commercial rights from the biotech giant, Monsanto.
This video of Daniel Ravicher, a patent lawyer, shows how ferociously the biotech industry is behaving around its patents. On Monsanto’s bags of GMO seeds is the following:
“Warning! Stop, these seeds are protected by our patents. You may only use these seeds in the ways that we allow you to. You can’t redistribute them to anyone else. …. You have to abide by our terms”
Ravicher explains the problem:
“Even if you don’t know you have been contaminated, once your property comes into possession of Monsanto’s seed, they can assert their patents against you and they have done so against others.”
Now, try a replay, substituting biotech’s patented GMOs in vaccines.
“Warning! Stop, these GMOs in your DNA are patented. You may only use this genetically modified DNA in the way we allow you to. You can’t redistribute them to anyone else. …. You have to abide by our terms.”
And Rachiver’s comments would apply to GMO vaccines.
“Even if you don’t know you have been contaminated, once your body comes into possession of pharma’s GMOs, they can assert their patents against you …. “
With the pharmaceutical industry vaccines, the comment should include the additional clause, “… even if you were denied informed consent and forced to be contaminated by government mandates and under false emergencies.”
Continuing from “Have Rabbis Forgotten …?“:
“Needless to say, giving untested, unknown vaccines is a “medical experiment” and violates the core principles of the Nuremberg – informed and unambiguous consent. Forcing people to take vaccines, whether by a proclaimed “emergency,” by a “public health” order from the WHO, or by threat of loss of rights over one’s children or of imprisonment, removes consent, as does giving vaccines to those unable by age or mental status to legally consent. “Informed,” as well, is hollowed of all meaning when people are tricked into taking vaccines by the use of false or frightening “information.” http://www.salem-news.com/articles/november072011/experiments-auschwitz-rg.php
The mandate around vaccines rests on the government argument that they prevent disease for the child taking the vaccines and provide herd immunity (protection for other children) and on the frightening “information” that the child could get polio or whooping cough or measles or hepatitis B and die. But the government argument is falling apart at every possible level. The vaccines are not preventing diseases, are causing paralysis and deaths, and increasing children’s risks.
“The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI’s polio vaccines are causing mass paralysis in India and Pakistan and with a more deadly strain than natural polio; the pertussus vaccines are spreading pertussis via vaccinated populations and creating a more virulent strain; the measles vaccines aren’t working to protect against measles; the pentavalent vaccine is causing a high number of adverse events and deaths; Andrew Wakefield’s work on the MMR vaccine has been substantiated; and these are only the most recent stories showing up primarily in foreign media….
“Unlike conventional drug treatments meant for the management of existing diseases, in prophylaxis with vaccines, safety is of paramount importance. Vaccines that frequently and unpredictably cause the death of healthy children cannot be recommended [said Jacob Puliyel, an eminent paediatrician at St. Stephen’s hospital in New Delhi and member of the NTAGI - India's National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation] …. ” [Emphasis added.]
This list does not include the government’s concession that the Hepatitis B vaccine causes Lupus.
Vermont parents fought back but they left out of their arguments two criminal and undeniable ones – 1) mandated vaccines which include polysorbate 80 are compulsory sterilization (genocide); and 2) the insertion of patented material into children’s DNA without informing the parent and obtaining a legal release, is theft of their child’s ownership of their own DNA (theft of intellectual property by deceptive trade practices).
The Nuremberg Code was written to protect the world from the gruesome experiments performed on concentration camp prisoners by the pharmaceutical industry. They industry sought a means to covertly sterilize those they wished to use merely as workers or slaves, and to take over control of the world. The same industry is still covertly sterilizing. And just as Monsanto is attempting to “own” food through patented intellectual property claims and is abetted by spread of its GMOs through contamination by pollen, vaccine-enforced DNA contamination through injecting patented GMOs into children’s DNA provides a means to take control of human DNA. Here the companies are abetted in this human-DNA contamination not by pollen but by corrupt state legislators.
Those legislators are abetting both the covert compulsory sterilization of America’s children (genocide), and the deceptive take over by multinational corporations of the ownership of American children’s human DNA (biopiracy). Vermont stood firm that parents decide. But there must be “informed” consent and information on what is really happening with the vaccines has been missing since it is unlikely that parents in the US would allow their child to be vaccinated with vaccines that increase their risk of disease, sterilize them, and steal their legal rights to their own DNA.
People will boggle at all three pieces of information but with the last is the newest threat, the theft of human-DNA, and people will certainly ask “For what purpose? In a Rense article in 2001 on the Bush administration’s deep ties to the pharmaceutical industry and to Nazi Germany, Robert Lederman describes the bizarre direction these corporations are going and why.
Daniel Ravicher speaking at the National Heirloom Expo in Santa Rosa, California in September, 2011 about the lawsuit OSGATA et al. v. Monsanto, the organic community lawsuit challenging Monsanto's transgenic/GMO patents. The case represents 83 plaintiffs made up of family farmers, seed businesses and organic agricultural organizations and represents over 300,000 members. For more information about the lawsuit visit www.osgata.org
Dan Ravicher is the Executive Director of the Public Patent Foundation and a lecturer in law at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.
Dan Ravicher is the Executive Director of the Public Patent Foundation and a lecturer in law at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.