Tuesday, September 2, 2014

The Top 15 Lies You Are Being Told by Mainstream Medicine by Marco Torres

The Top 15 Lies You’re Being Told About Health and Mainstream Medicine

Marco Torres, Prevent Disease

Waking Times

Do you ever question what doctors, nutritionists, institutions and even science tells you about your health, food, environment and lifestyle?

You should, because we live in an era of deception and duplicity where the most trusted and valued sources of information are hijacked by much bigger interests than you can imagine. The internet is one of the last frontiers for truth, informing and educating billions on why our systems of health, agriculture, medicine and many other areas we depend on are failing us.

he reason they’re failing us is because corrupt governments, corporations and the media are constantly feeding us lies on a daily basis, which through repetition, the public eventually accepts as truth.


A lot of food that we eat today contains genetically modified ingredients and usually without our knowledge. Supporters of this technology maintain that it ensures and sustains food security around the world as the population increases.

As well as scientific debates on the merits of genetically engineered food, there are equally, if not more important, debates on the socioeconomic ramifications of the way such science is marketed and used.

The dangers of GMO foods can no longer be denied. Researchers havelinked organ damage with consumption of Monsanto’s GM maize.

Biotechnology companies erroneously claim that their manipulations are similar to natural genetic changes or traditional breeding techniques. However, the cross-species transfers being made, such as between fish and tomatoes, or between other unrelated species, would not happen in nature and may create new toxins, diseases, and weaknesses.

When genetic engineers insert a new gene into any organism there are “position effects” which can lead to unpredictable changes in the pattern of gene expression and genetic function. The protein product of the inserted gene may carry out unexpected reactions and produce potentially toxic products.

There is also serious concern about the dangers of using genetically engineered viruses as delivery vehicles (vectors) in the generation of transgenic plants and animals. This could destabilise the genome, and also possibly create new viruses, and thus dangerous new diseases.

Unlike chemical or nuclear contamination, genetic pollution is self-perpetuating. It can never be reversed or cleaned up; genetic mistakes will be passed on to all future generations of a species.


The danger of magnetic, electric, wireless, radio (microwave), ground current, and high frequency radiation is that it is mostly invisible until great damage is done – like the increased risk of some brain tumors in long term cell phone users.

Sensitivity to electromagnetic radiation is a very big health problem of our youngest generations. The media and medical community dismiss it, but it is imperative health practitioners, governments, schools and our entire society learn more about the risks because the human health stakes are significant.

Studies suggest that women briefly exposed to very high-intensity EMFs have an increased risk of miscarriage, especially EMFs emitted by power lines and electrical appliances.

A growing percentage of people are now heeding the advice of holistic health experts and disposing of their microwaves due to the dangers of microwaved food.

The effect of EMFs on biological tissue remains controversial. Virtually all scientists agree that more research is necessary to determine safe or dangerous levels. It’s like one big human experiment which we won’t know the results of for several decades. Now, with the increasing proliferation of wireless handheld and portable devices, it is literally impossible to escape EMFs in any major city.

What they do know is that iron, which is necessary for healthy blood and is stored in the brain, is highly affected by EMFs. The permeability of the cell membranes of nerves, blood vessels, skin and other organs is also affected, as well as the intricate DNA of the chromosomes. Every bodily biochemical process involves precisely choreographed movement of EMF sensitive atoms, molecules, and ions.

Not only do EMFs impact your own health and that of your children and pets, but also the Earth as a whole, as our overuse of electricity contributes greatly to pollution from coal-fired electricity plants. Those who are wise will heed the warnings of the electrically sensitive and reduce the EMF radiation in their homes through good design and reduction of dependence on electric appliances.


Even though the medical community advocates for regular screenings for those with illnesses, they may bring little benefit and may actually pose harm to your health. This applies to almost every type of medical screening for cancer and several other diseases.
Medical screening carries an immense risk in itself, not only due to the damage inflicted by screening techniques on the human body, but by the very nature of medical follow-up protocols. These protocols usually encourage patients to enter deeper into more invasive techniques, which further cripple health and lead to a very high percentage of fatalities.

Doctors are often criticized for prescribing unneeded tests and procedures that harm more than they help and add to medical costs that could otherwise be avoided. 12 medical tests and procedures now being questioned worldwide as unnecessary and potentially cause — sometimes harmful results to patients.

Radiation-induced cancers have tripled in the last two decades anddiagnostic imaging has been already been admitted as a cause by the U.S. government.

There is a secular trend between breast cancer mortality and screening programs specifically medial diagnostic techniques such asmammography. In a Swedish study of 60,000 women, 70 percent of the mammographically detected tumors weren’t tumors at all.

These “false positives” aren’t just financial and emotional strains, they may also lead to many unnecessary and invasive biopsies. In fact, 70 to 80 percent of all positive mammograms do not, upon biopsy, show any presence of cancer.

A prostate (PSA) blood test looks for prostate-specific antigen, a protein produced by the prostate gland. High levels are supposedly associated with prostate cancer. The problem is that the association isn’t always correct, and when it is, the prostate cancer isn’t necessarily deadly.

Only about 3 percent of all men die from prostate cancer. The PSA test usually leads to overdiagnosis — biopsies and treatment in which the side effects are impotence and incontinence. Repeated biopsies may spread cancer cells into the track formed by the needle, or by spilling cancerous cells directly into the bloodstream or lympathic system.

News coverage of many diseases focus too much on treatments and not enough on prevention, a trend that could prove risky in the long run for most people who don’t understand how to take care of their health.


A growing number of communities are choosing to stop adding fluoride to their water systems, even though the federal government and federal health officials maintain their full support for a measure they say provides a 25 percent reduction in tooth decay nationwide.

There are now serious facts and health risks regarding fluoridationwhich can no longer be ignored and the practice itself is being questioned by most of the world.
Austrian researchers proved in the 1970s that as little as 1 ppm fluoride concentration can disrupt DNA repair enzymes by 50%. When DNA can’t repair damaged cells, we get old fast.

Fluoride prematurely ages the body, mainly by distortion of enzyme shape. All systems of the body are dependent upon enzymes. When fluoride changes the enzymes, this can damage every system and function of the body.

Dr. Paul Connett, PhD stated “When historians come to write about this period, they will single out fluoridation as the single biggest mistake in public policy that we’ve ever had.”

David Kennedy, DDS President International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology said that “water fluoridation is the single largest case of scientific fraud, promoted by the government, supported by taxpayer dollars, aided and abetted by the ADA and the AMA, in the history of the planet.”

Perhaps one of the biggest health myths propagated in western culture and certainly in the United States, is the misuse of an invented term “bad cholesterol” by the media and medical community.

Moreover, a scientifically-naive public has been conned into a fraudulent correlation between elevated cholesterol and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cholesterol has not been shown to actually cause CVD. To the contrary, cholesterol is vital to our survival, and trying to artificially lower it can have detrimental effects, particularly as we age.

We have become a culture so obsessed with eating foods low in cholesterol and fat that many health experts are now questioning the consequences. Could we really maintain a dietary lifestyle that was so foreign to many of our ancestral populations without any ill effects on our health?

Many researchers are now concluding that the answer to that question is “NO.” Current data is now suggesting that lower cholesterol levels predate the development of cancer. Scientific papers prove that people with high so-called “Bad” LDL cholesterol live the longest.

The ‘noddy-science’ offered by marketing men to a generally scientifically-naive public has led many people to believe that we should replace certain food choices with specially developed products that can help ‘reduce cholesterol’.

Naturally this comes at a price and requires those who can afford it to pay maybe four or five times what a ‘typical ordinary’ product might cost. But is this apparent ‘blanket need’ to strive towards lowering our cholesterol justified? And, indeed, is it healthy?
The cholesterol itself, whether being transported by LDL or HDL, is exactly the same. Cholesterol is simply a necessary ingredient that is required to be regularly delivered around the body for the efficient healthy development, maintenance and functioning of our cells.

The difference is in the ‘transporters’ (the lipoproteins HDL and LDL) and both types are essential for the human body’s delivery logistics to work effectively.

Problems can occur, however, when the LDL particles are both small and their carrying capacity outweighs the transportation potential of available HDL. This can lead to more cholesterol being ‘delivered’ around the body with lower resources for returning excess capacity to the liver.

We need to reform education on what really causes heart disease and why cholesterol, whether high or low, is not an evil process in the body, but a natural part of our biology. When we stop listening to medical doctors, suddenly we start listening to what our bodies crave… to be the healthiest version of ourselves.


Sunscreen is full of some of the most toxic chemicals known. Yet both the cancer and sunscreen industries insist on their use to ironically prevent cancer from “bad” sunlight. People still fall for this nonsense, slather on the sunscreen in hopes to protect against a non-existent foe. If the sun was really that harmful, we’d all be dead long ago.

Meanwhile, a growing body of evidence shows that blocking the sun’s rays from reaching our skin dramatically influences our optimal vitamin D levels, leading to higher mortality, critical illness, mental health disorders and ironically, cancer itself. Here’s why you need to make your own sunscreen.

There are well over 800 references in the medical literature showing vitamin D’s effectiveness–both for the prevention and treatment of cancer.

Blocking the sun’s rays from reaching our skin dramatically influences our optimal vitamin D levels, leading to higher mortality, critical illness andmental health disorders. Ironically, sunscreen itself causes cancer.

Exposure to sunlight and ultraviolet light has been repeatedly shown to NOT be the cause of skin cancer. Scientists from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center reported UVA exposure is unlikely to have contributed to the rise in the incidence of melanoma over the past 30 years.

The idea that sunscreen prevents cancer is also a myth promoted by pharmaceutical companies, conventional medicine and the mainstream media for one purpose…profit. The sunscreen industry makes money by selling lotion products that actually contain cancer-causing chemicals.

It then donates a portion of that money to the cancer industry through non-profit groups like Cancer Societies which, in turn, run heart-breaking public service ads urging people to use sunscreen to “prevent cancer.”

The term “immunization”, often substituted for vaccination, is false and should be legally challenged. Medical research has well established that the direct injection of foreign proteins and other toxic material (particularly known immune-sensitising poisons such as mercury) makes the recipient more, not less, easily affected by what he/she encounters in the future.

This means they do the opposite of immunize, commonly even preventing immunity from developing after natural exposure. There are 5 phases of awakening to the dangers of vaccination and many lie in different phases.

The actual frequency of health problems has been estimated by authorities to be possibly up to 100 times, or more, greater than that reported by government agencies. That difference is due to the lack of enforcement or incentive for doctors to report adverse effects.

With the anti-vaccination movements now exposing the truth on the internet, the medical community is now on high alert, defending their claims and being told by vaccine manufacturers that they must never let their patients (or parents) think that the risks could outweigh the benefits, when in reality, it is precisely the opposite that is true.

Convincing evidence is finally coming forward from peer reviewed studies which show that the rapid increase in the number of vaccines given to children is creating synergistic toxicity and a state of immune overload in the majority of vaccine recipients manifesting in related health issues including epidemics of obesity, diabetes, and autism.

The benefit risk ratio is an important decision in anyone deciding whether to vaccinate or not. Contrary to popular belief and marketing, childhood diseases in a developed country are not as dangerous as we are led to believe.

Catching a particular disease does not mean you will die from it. Vaccines were actually introduced at a time when diseases had already declined to a low risk level. This fact is proven, scientifically.

The main advances in combating disease over the last 200 years have been better food and clean drinking water…not vaccines. Improved sanitation, less overcrowded and better living conditions also contribute.

This is also borne out in published peer reviewed research which prove that vaccine did not save us. The is irrefutable evidence which shows that the historical application of vaccines had no health benefit or impact on prevention of infectious disease.

All vaccines contain sterility agents, neurotoxins, immunotoxins, and carcinogenic compounds. Some examples include formaldehyde, a carcinogen found in almost every vaccine, neurotoxins such asmonosodium glutamatepotassium chloridethimerosal, sterility agents such as Triton X-100octoxynol-10, polysorbate 80, and immuntoxins such as neomycinmonobasic potassium phosphate,sodium deoxycholate to name a few of many.

It is no coincidence that the more educated you are, the less chance you will vaccinate which contradicts the misconceptions of many health professionals who profess that parents don’t vaccinate because they are under-educated, poor or misinformed. Those who become fully informed of the dangers of vaccines never see them in the same light again, as their motives then become clear.


Perhaps the biggest health myth today is the public’s misconception that mainstream medicine and the healthcare system helps sick people. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Why do people follow medical authorities who prescribe toxic vaccinations, medications and treatments which only serve as a detriment to human health?
The freedom of people to choose natural healing, alternative medicine and methods of disease prevention could soon be threatened by corporate lobbyists who will do anything to protect their wealth at the expense of your health.

90 percent of all diseases (cancer, diabetes, depression, heart disease, etc.) are easily preventable through diet, nutrition, sunlight and exercise. None of these solutions are ever promoted by conventional medicine because they make no money.

No pharmaceuticals actually cure or resolve the underlying causes of disease. Even “successful” drugs only manage symptoms, usually at the cost of interfering with other physiological functions that will cause side effects down the road. There is no such thing as a drug without a side effect.

There is no financial incentive for anyone in today’s system of medicine (drug companies, hospitals, doctors, etc.) to actually make patients well. Profits are found in continued sickness, not wellness or prevention.

The main error of the biomedical approach is the confusion between disease processes and disease origins. Instead of asking why an illness occurs, and trying to remove the conditions that lead to it, medical researchers try to understand the biological mechanisms through which the disease operates, so that they can interfere with them.
These mechanisms, rather than the true origins, are seen as the causes of disease in current medical thinking and this confusion lies at the very centre of the conceptual problems of contemporary medicine.

Almost all the “prevention” programs you see today (such as free mammograms or other screening programs) are nothing more than patient recruitment schemes designed to increase revenue and sickness. They use free screenings to scare people into agreeing to unnecessary treatments that only lead to further disease.

Nobody has any interest in your health except you. No corporation, no doctor, and no government has any desire to actually make you well. This has served the short-term financial interests of higher powers in the west very well. The only healthy, aware, critically thinking individuals are all 100% free of pharmaceuticals and processed Foods.

To read the entire article, please click on the link provided below:

Organics Talks

Be Kind Always - Author Unknown

Monday, September 1, 2014

CDC Whistleblower Revealed

US CDC Caused Thousands of US Black Children to Develop Autism & Hid the Data – CDC Whistleblower Named

Start the video at 5 minutes in to see the key admissions, confirmations and identity of the senior CDC scientist and whistleblower who revealed the information about the misconduct by this US government agency:


Child Health Safety


Divide & Conquer - The Age Old Game Continues



Note:  Now we have elections in Europé .  Another manifestation of this principal.  

Gardasil Changed My Whole Life Living In Denmark by Anika Hjorth

Hjorth Family
Gardasil changed my whole Life

By Anika Hjorth 
Fredericia, Denmark

I am the mother of three children, ages 1, 8 and 9. In addition to taking care of my home and family, I work as the sales coordinator for a local newspaper. I enjoy family outings and holidays.  I used to run 20km at a time to stay physically fit. Gardasil changed all of this.

The quadrivalent HPV vaccine, Gardasil, was approved for use in Denmark in 2006. I had read a little on the internet about it, but did not find any reason why I should not take the vaccine. On many sites, Gardasil was looked at as a somewhat miraculous breakthrough in the prevention of cervical cancer.

March 26 2013. I got my first injection of the HPV-vaccine, Gardasil.

May 1st, 2013, I woke up during the night with extremely low blood pressure and a terrible pressure in the chest. I had difficulty breathing and the low blood pressure made me dizzy. My boyfriend called the doctor who only ordered me to stay calm and rest. He questioned whether my sphygmomanometer (blood pressure monitor) was working at all. I knew I bought it in 2012 and it was a very good quality instrument.

During the long period after, I had a lot of off days where my blood pressure was very low, my  heart rate was high and I felt unwell in general.
For a long time I fought extremely low blood pressure. I felt so tired and exhausted. I was constantly nauseous, which I thought to be connected to the fact I was so tired and did not have any energy at all.

My doctor suggested eating liquorice – actually he was not very worried about my condition.

May 27, 2013 I had a similar attack as described above. Again I contacted my doctor and told him that something was wrong in my body but I could not explain what.

On May 29 we planned to travel down to the South of Europe for two weeks, but something told me it would never work out. My doctor decided to refer me to Fredericia Hospital. He wanted me to be tested for some rare heart diseases.  The chief physician explained that travelling with this low blood pressure and the other symptoms I had would not be safe. Then a longer diagnosing period started including a lot of different tests.

June 13th 2013 I got my second vaccination. Between the two vaccinations I had weak health but I did not think about any connection to the first vaccination, so I got the second.

On July 19. 2013 I got a call from the chief physician who informed me that everything was normal. The reason for my symptoms was that I was dreaming about an earlier course of disease in connection with the birth of my first daughter. That should be the reason for the hyperventilation and the low blood pressure. And the low blood pressure gave me the nausea. He could not explain the very strong pain I had in my legs.

On July 28, 2013 my boyfriend saw the front page of one of our tabloid newspapers. The headline was 422.000 have received the HPV-cancer-vaccination – doctors are worried about the side effects. In the article we read about the side effects and the damages the vaccine could cause to the body. When I read the symptoms, it was like reading a list of my own new medical conditions. In the next couple of days I realized that the vaccination could be the reason for my new disorders.

On August 15, 2013 I went to my doctor bringing the newspaper. He listened with interest and skepticism. He took the newspaper in order to read it thoroughly and thereafter gave me his judgment. He saw the similarities and suddenly all my symptoms made sense. My doctor understands me. He recognizes and accepts my new medical conditions as side effects of HPV vaccination.

On August 24, 2013 I was hospitalized again with difficulty breathing, chest pains and muscle spasms. I was met by skepticism at the hospital.  As all blood tests and EKG did not show any signs of disease, they could only conclude that I did not feel well and as they said, ”We are so sorry.” The next day I was sent home. I stayed in bed for a week due to pain in my legs and chest.

Today June 30, 2014 my side effects are completely controlling my everyday life. They are as follows:
  • Extremely low blood pressure (measured as low as  70/43)
  • Constant nausea
  • Constant changing heart rate
  • Burning pain in the body
  • Constant heartburn
  • Pressure in the chest, difficulty breathing – often during  the evening and into the night
  • Short of breath even during light exercise
  • Itching
  • Problems with short-term memory
  • Pain in the stomach
  • A lot of pain in the legs
  • A lot of pain the sole of my foot
  • Loss of strength in the muscles
  • Very painful periods including heavy bleeding
  • Visual disorders in the left eye
  • Pressure in the ears
  • Lack of B3, D vitamin and calcium
The symptoms are influencing my daily life as follows: 
  • I cannot take care of the household
  • I have difficulty going to the first floor of our house
  • I need help very often to take care of our three children
  • I cannot arrange anything ahead as I do not know how my condition will be from one day to the next
  • On bad days I cannot drive our car
  • I can only work 30 hours a week
  • I cannot take care of the shopping
  • I cannot handle more than one thing at a time
  • I am only capable of a limited number of impressions a day
  • We are considering selling the house due to uncertainty of what the future holds
  • I am tied to the house. I cannot travel, do any trips or similar activities
  • I cannot run anymore – I used to run 20 km at a time
  • I am completely exhausted after 1.5 km walking with the baby carriage
  • I am dependent on others 24 hours a day
I wish Gardasil was like other medications. When you have an adverse reaction to a pill you are taking, you simply discontinue using it and the symptoms go away. It is not nearly as easy to fix a bad reaction to a vaccine.


Sane Vax, Inc.

HPV Vaccine VAERS Reports up to June 2014

Did Not Recover7,111
Abnormal Pap Smear572
Cervical Dysplasia243
Cervical Cancer78
Life Threatening640
Emergency Room11,705
Extended Hospital Stay251
Adverse Events35,270

Le Gardasil a changé toute ma vie par Anika Hjorth

Hjorth Famille

Le Gardasil a changé toute ma vie

par Anika Hjorth,

Initiative Citoyenne,    15 août 2014

Je suis la maman de 3 enfants de 1, 8 et 9 ans. Outre le soin de la maison et l’éducation des enfants, je travaille en tant que coordinatrice de ventes pour un journal local. J’adore les sorties en famille et les vacances. J’avais l’habitude de courir régulièrement 20 km pour rester en parfaite forme physique. Le Gardasil a tout bouleversé.

Le vaccin quadrivalant contre le HPV, le Gardasil a été approuvé pour utilisation au Danemark en 2006. J’avais un peu lu sur internet à ce sujet, mais n’ai pas trouvé de raison pour ne pas faire le vaccin. Sur de nombreux sites, les Gardasil était présenté comme une découverte presque miraculeuse pour la prévention du cancer du col de l’utérus.
26 mars 2013. C’est alors que j’ai reçu ma première injection du vaccin HPV, le Gardasil.
1er mai 2013. Je me suis réveillée au cours de la nuit  avec une pression artérielle très faible et une terrible oppression sur la poitrine. J’éprouvais des difficultés à respirer et la pression artérielle trop basse me provoquait des vertiges. Mon compagnon a appelé un médecin qui m’a ordonné de rester calme et de prendre du repos. Il s’est, un moment, demandé si mon tensiomètre marchait toujours. Mais je savais que je l’avais acheté en 2012 et qu’il s’agissait d’un appareil de bonne qualité.
Au cours de la longue période qui a suivi, j’ai dû prendre beaucoup de jours de congé. Je me sentais très mal. Ma tension artérielle était très basse et mon rythme cardiaque trop élevé.
Pendant longtemps, j’ai eu une très faible tension artérielle. Je me sentais extrêmement fatiguée et épuisée. J’avais constamment des nausées que je croyais liées au fait que j’étais si fatiguée et que je n’avais pratiquement pas d’énergie.
Mon médecin m’a suggéré de manger du réglisse – en fait il ne semblait pas trop s’inquiéter de mon état.
27 mai 2013. J’ai fait une crise tout à fait semblable à celle que j’ai décrite plus haut. J’ai à nouveau contacté mon médecin et lui ai expliqué que quelque chose n’allait pas du tout, bien que je ne sache pas l’expliquer.
Le 29 mai nous avions pensé faire un voyage de deux semaines dans le sud de l’Europe, mais quelque chose me disait  que ce ne serait pas possible. Mon médecin décida alors de m’envoyer à l’hôpital « Frederica ». Il voulait que je passe des tests pour certaines maladies cardiaques rares. Le médecin chef m’expliqua qu’il ne serait pas sans danger de voyager avec une tension aussi faible et les autres symptômes que je présentais. Dans la suite j’ai été soumise à toute une série de tests.
C’est le 13 juin 2013 que j’ai reçu ma seconde injection. Après la première vaccination, ma santé avait été très fragile, mais comme je n’avais pas pu imaginer qu’il pouvait y avoir un lien avec la vaccination, j’ai donné mon accord pour la seconde injection.
Le 19 juillet, j’ai reçu un coup de fil du médecin chef de l’hôpital qui m’a informé que tout était normal..La raison de mes symptômes devait être cherchée dans le fait que j’imaginais des problèmes de santé en relation avec la naissance de ma première fille. C’était cela qui devait expliquer l’hyperventilation et la tension trop basse. Et c’était cette tension basse qui me donnait des nausées. Mais ce médecin ne pouvait pas expliquer les fortes douleurs que je ressentais dans les jambes.
Le 28 juillet 2013, en ouvrant la première page du journal mon compagnon découvrit ce titre : 422.000 personnes ont reçu le vaccin HPV contre le cancer du col de l’utérus – les médecins sont préoccupés par les effets secondaires. Cet article évoquait les effets secondaires et les dommages que le vaccin pouvait causer à l’organisme. En lisant cette liste de symptômes, c’était comme si je découvrais dans ce journal la liste de mes nouveaux problèmes de santé. Dans les jours qui ont suivi, j’ai réalisé que la vaccination pourrait être la raison de mes problèmes de santé.
Le 15 août 2013, je me décidai à remettre l’article du journal à mon médecin. Il m’écouta avec intérêt, mais aussi avec scepticisme. Il garda le journal pour lire l’entièreté de l’article m’assurant qu’il me ferait connaître ses conclusions. Il finit par prendre conscience des similitudes et finalement tous mes symptômes prirent sens à ses yeux. Enfin mon médecin me comprenait. Il reconnaissait et acceptait que mes problèmes de santé devaient être des effets secondaires de la vaccination contre le HPV.
Le 24 août 2013, je fus hospitalisée parce que j’éprouvais des difficultés respiratoires, des douleurs thoraciques et des spasmes musculaires. A l’hôpital je n’ai rencontré que du scepticisme parce que les tests sanguins et l’ECG ne montraient aucun signe de maladie. Ils pouvaient accepter que je puisse ne pas me sentir bien mais précisaient qu’ils étaient désolés. Le lendemain, je fus renvoyée à la maison. J’ai dû tenir le lit pendant une semaine suite aux douleurs dans mes jambes et à la poitrine.
Aujourd ‘hui 30 juin 2014, ma vie de chaque jour est perturbée par les effets secondaires suivants :
*   Très faible pression artérielle (70/43)
*   Nausées constantes
*   Changement constant du rythme cardiaque
*   Douleurs brûlantes dans le corps
*   Constantes brûlures d’estomac
*   Pression dans la poitrine, difficultés respiratoires (le plus souvent dans la soirée et  au cours de la nuit)
*   Souffle court même au cours d’exercices légers
*   Démangeaisons
*   Problèmes de mémoire à court terme
*   Douleurs d’estomac
*   Beaucoup de douleurs dans les jambes
*   Douleurs sur la plante du pied
*   Perte de force dans les muscles
*   Règles très douloureuses avec saignements abondants
*   Troubles visuels à l’œil gauche
*   Pression dans les oreilles
*   Manque de vitamine B3, de vitamine D et de calcium
Tous ces symptômes ont un impact sur ma vie de tous les jours :
*   Je ne peux plus m’occuper du ménage
*   J’éprouve beaucoup de difficultés à me rendre au premier étage de la maison
*   J’ai très souvent besoin d’aide pour prendre soin de nos trois enfants
*   Je ne puis organiser quoi que ce soit parce que je ne puis savoir comment je me sentirai d’un jour à l’autre
*   Les mauvais jours, je suis incapable de conduire la voiture
*   Je ne puis travailler que 30 heures semaine
*   Je ne puis plus faire les courses
*   Je ne peux pas gérer plus d’une chose à la fois…
*   Nous envisageons de vendre la maison en raison des incertitudes concernant l’avenir
*  Je suis clouée à la maison, je ne puis plus voyager ou faire d’activités similaires
*   Il m’est impossible de courir alors que j’avais l’habitude de courir 20 km par jour
*   Après avoir fait 1,5 km avec la voiture d’enfant je suis complètement épuisée
*   Je suis dépendante des autres 24 heures par jour.
Je souhaiterais que le Gardasil soit comme les autres médicaments. Lorsque vous avez une réaction indésirable à une pilule que vous prenez, vous cessez simplement de l’utiliser et les symptômes disparaissent. Il n’est pas aussi facile de corriger une mauvaise réaction à un vaccin.

Initiative Citoyenne

VAERS  (Vacccine Adverse Events Reporting System)
Organisme officiel américain de vaccinovigilance qui recueille les rapports d’effets secondaires possibles des vaccins aux Etats-Unis. Il est contrôlé par le CDC et la FDA
Mise à jour des chiffres au mois de JUIN 2014  pour les
Vaccins contre le cancer du col de l’utérus
Rapports d’effets secondaires
N’ont pas récupéré
Frottis du col anormaux
Dysplasies du col de l’utérus
Cancers du col de l’utérus
Cas où le pronostic vital a été engagé
Visites aux urgences
Séjours hospitaliers prolongés
Effets secondaires graves
Effets secondaires
P.S. Seuls 1 à 10% des effets secondaires seraient généralement rapportés