Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Is ACLU Aware? Sebelius, HHS Censor Vaccine Concerns, Produce ‘Fertility Impairing Vaccine’ by Richard Duncan



Is ACLU Aware? Sebelius, HHS Censor Vaccine Concerns, Produce ‘Fertility Impairing Vaccine’

By Richard Duncan

Food Freedom News,  April 30, 2012

The ACLU produced a paper on the pandemic laws pointing out that they lack public health measures. They are solely about “security” (martial law). The laws can be invoked without proof of even an infectious disease in the area and yet include the forcing of unknown, untested vaccines on the country, with no exceptions. People could be taken away (imprisoned) for refusing, where they would likely be vaccinated in any case.

To put it mildly, these are vaccine safety issues.

The ACLU is focused on the First Amendment. Is it aware that Kathleen Sebelius at the Dept. of Health & Human Services (HHS) censored media from reporting on vaccine safety issues?

Is the ACLU aware that large range of “concerns” about vaccines are breaking out around the world?
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI’s polio vaccines are causing mass paralysis in India and Pakistan and with a more deadly strain than natural polio; the pertussus vaccines are spreading pertussis via vaccinated populations and creating a more virulent strain; the measles vaccines aren’t working to protect against measles; the pentavalent vaccine is causing a high number of adverse events and deaths; Andrew Wakefield’s work on the MMR vaccine has been substantiated; and these are only the most recent stories showing up primarily in foreign media.

If the ACLU is not aware, is it because HHS has suppressed just such news of vaccine failures in the US? Is the ACLU aware that major media attacking those questioning vaccine safety are heavily invested in the vaccines themselves?

The outbreak of measles among children vaccinated (often more than once) against measles brings vaccination for prevention of disease into question. With pertussis, the questions deepen as the vaccines are spreading the disease it is meant to prevent and even generating a more virulent strain.

The pentavalent vaccine is killing healthy children.

Puliyel likened the situation to penicillin sensitivity and said it bordered on criminality to be administering pentavalents without first testing a child for hypersensitivity. “Every child that is being given a dose of pentavalent vaccine is a potential victim of the adverse reaction,” he said.

Puliyel was among the many eminent physicians and public health activists in India who wrote to World Health Organisation (WHO) director-general Margaret Chan on Apr. 3 asking the health body to “re-evaluate” its recommendation of pentavalent vaccines on the grounds of safety. ….

“Unlike conventional drug treatments meant for the management of existing diseases, in prophylaxis with vaccines, safety is of paramount importance. Vaccines that frequently and unpredictably cause the death of healthy children cannot be recommended,” the letter to Chan said.

Puliyel says, “Our article describes how the World Health Organisation (WHO), in an elaborate cover-up, changed its own criteria for classifying adverse effects to say the vaccine was not responsible for the deaths in Sri Lanka,” Jacob Puliyel, head of paediatrics at St Stephen’s Hospital in Delhi and key author, told IANS….

The authors point out that the pentavalent vaccine was withdrawn in Sri Lanka in April 2008 after 25 serious adverse reactions that included five deaths and Bhutan stopped its use within two months of introduction in July 2009 after eight deaths.

When it comes to polio, the vaccines are not just a failure but a health calamity. 47,500 cases of paralysis. And these vaccines that are failing – in not preventing diseases, in spreading disease, in crippling and in killing – these are TESTED vaccines.

The pandemic laws allow for power over the entire population based on an (unproven) emergency in which the vaccines do not have to be tested – or even known.

Yet the FDA has given the go ahead to manufacturers to add or change any ingredient with the approval of only one employee – a means to insert squalene which is not approved in the US, and yet HHS (with Sebelius at the helm) and Novartis share a contract to build a giant facility in NC to produce squalene under money from the stimulus bill.

“Even though its use has not been approved by U.S. regulators, the plant will be producing MF59 as early as December 2009.(2) MF59 is Novartis’ proprietary and controversial adjuvant composed of squalene and a surfactant called Tween80, also known as polysorbate 80. Back in July, 2009, the department of HHS purchased over $343.8M of ‘oil-in-water’ adjuvant from Norvartis.(3) It looks like the government may want to take delivery on its purchase some time soon.”

Is the ACLU aware that not only is HHS censoring vaccines concerns but has purchased the two key ingredients in a pharmaceutical industry patent to impair fertility? That is, to sterilize?

“On the World Intellectual Property Organization, a patent application for a ‘fertility impairing vaccine’. The University of Georgia Research Foundation is listed as the patent applicant.

“In the description section of the patent application, Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) is listed as a preferred ingredient:

“’In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil, in an amount of about 2.5% to about 15%, preferably about 8% to about 12%. In preparing the vaccine it is advantageous to combine a concentrated oily adjuvant composition with an aqueous solution of the antigen, pZP glycoprotein. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin (about 5% to about 15 % wt/vol, preferably about 12% wt/vol) and STDCM (preferably about 25 mg/mL to about 50 mg/mL) in squalene oil. The term % wt/vol means grams per 100 mL of liquid. The aqueous solution containing the isolated pZP glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80 (about 0.2% vol/vol to about 0.8% vol/vol, preferably about 0.4% vol/vol).’”

Is the ACLU aware that damaging the ability of a group to reproduce is listed by the UN as one of the definitions of genocide?

To read the entire article, please click on the link provided below:


Pam Bickell said...

Wow, Mike. I don't know what to say. This is beyond the boundaries of things my mind can accept.

Stranger in a Strange Land said...

Hello Pam:

It's in the realm of madness in my view.

Stay sane,